nowwearetalking is about telecommunications and you. It's where you can become involved, have your say, and Telstra listens - on issues affecting all Australians and the telecommunications industry. nowwearetalking is managed by Telstra. Find out more about this site.

Customise Page

Customise topic view

Please select items below for your custom page.

Re-organising your page

Log in here

Forgotten your password?Use ssl security

Register now

Use ssl security

Customise topic view

Customising your topic view will tailor your user experience by only displaying content which is relevant to the topic/s you have selected.

This setting will apply site-wide and will remain applied until you wish to change it.

Customise your modules

Customise your modules allows you to add or remove panels of content which appear on the homepage.

These can be added to or removed from the homepage at any time.

Re-organising your page

Bush 'experts' glued to rear-view mirror



Topic: Telstra , Shareholder

Tags:    accc  blog  helen-coonan  investment  next-g-network  regional-telecommunications  rod-bruem  rural  telstra  the-telstra-phile


Apparently socialism is back in fashion as a result of the big government banking bail-outs in the US and UK of recent weeks.

This is welcome news in Australia, particularly rural and regional Australia, where there has always been a firm belief that government intervention and hand-outs are the ultimate cure for all ills.

Just like a pair of elastic-sided boots and a good Fletcher Jones wool blazer, agrarian socialism never goes out of style.

If you ever had doubts, have a read of the Federal Government’s report into regional telecommunications (www.rtirc.gov.au) just released.

The committee responsible was appointed by the late great Communications Minister Helen Coonan in one of her final acts just before she helped the Howard Government out of office.

Senator Coonan decided to ask a doctor, a lawyer, a politician and a farmer to conduct the inquiry - presumably because they were "independent' from the industry. Unfortunately, after reading what could well be Australia’s most expensive motherhood statement, the word “incompetent” also comes to mind.

There could be a joke there…’what do you get when you ask a doctor, a lawyer, a politician etc… But this isn’t funny.

The report is ignorant at best, deplorable at worst. It makes wild and unsubstantiated statements about the woeful state of telecommunications in the bush and proposes to resolve problems by either regulating Telstra even further, or by throwing more money at Telstra's competitors.

Essentially it's calling for more of the same policies that have failed rural and regional Australia in the past.

One example that sticks out is its call for the regulation of backhaul through “facilitated shared-planning and access arrangements” (i.e. think Stalinist central planning - a forced handover of Telstra investments to competitors with bureaucrats left to decide the terms and conditions)

This has always been at the top of the Christmas wish list of Telstra’s competitors – they’ve already made fortunes piggybacking on Telstra’s investments, so they just keep saying ‘can we have some more please’.

The Review Committee’s backwards-looking report completely ignores the fact that rural and regional Australia has enjoyed its biggest advance in telecommunications ever over the past three years thanks to Telstra’s investment in the Next G™ Network.

Next G™ is transforming the way Australians live and conduct business. (I should disclose this blog was written sitting on the veranda of a farm in Northern NSW using Next G™ wireless broadband)

And it may never have happened.

At one point some of the hardline agrarian socialists were supporting calls for this investment to be given away to competitors.

If the ACCC had agreed to these demands, Telstra would have been forced to shut it down.

For once however the ACCC took a sensible approach and as a result, SingTel and Vodafone are now attempting to build similar competitive networks. Admittedly they both appear to be failing miserably, but at least they are trying.

It is a light-handed regulation, entrepreneurship, competition, and investment that are delivering real world-leading telecommunications for the bush today and will do so in future.

It’s a shame our so-called leaders and ‘experts’ can’t recognise that.

Comments

Grahame Lynch
1 comment

20 October 2008
3:52pm

Comment Permalink

Yes Rod, when are we going to see a cost benefit study that accurately quantifies the real cost to the community of subsidising bush communications and the actual benefit to the the economy of doing so. Whenever I have engaged people with this argument I simply get labelled as a city slicker who doesn't understand that I should be transferring my income to the "real Australians" to the bush and that I am, evidently, unpatriotic and possibly, evil. This latest regional review is notable for one thing - no recourse to any form of economic argument. What a waste of time.


Vasso Massonic
389 comments

20 October 2008
7:31pm

Comment Permalink

It's a circus. Starring a Commission, a Committee an expert panel and a brand new Minister. What can we expect.
http://news.smh.com.au/business/


Adam Smith
1 comment

21 October 2008
3:21pm

Comment Permalink

Agrarian socialism is definitely alive and well in the bush just ask the AWB!! Unfortunately these people want champagne services at beer prices. Just as cities have a greater availability of services than the bush the same needs to be the case with telecommunications unless of course they are willing to pay for it ......which as we know they are not!!


Vince Van Patten
1 comment

10 November 2008
9:13am

Comment Permalink

What a bunch of clowns. Sitting on his Veranda on a "farm" way out bush in Northern NSW , what a hero , Mulumbimby no doubt , best known for weed. I wonder if that's what has provoked this irrational outburst. Stereo typing "farmers" can be scary Rod. Stick to the facts , yes the report wasn't a ideal but if you were a "farmer" you would understand the situation . As for a cost benefit study , more irrational comment. I'll take that bet , as it would include both the Rural and Mining sectors. Mining royalties . ??? Stick to the facts you lot of Latte loving "Farmers" and Pitt St know it alls. You obviously have never made it past the Blue Mountains with your apple Iphone . It wont work most places where the real farming and wealth of Australia is earn't. We accept that but want the best we can get .
Vince.


Add a comment

 

You need to log in to post a comment