nowwearetalking is about telecommunications and you. It's where you can become involved, have your say, and Telstra listens - on issues affecting all Australians and the telecommunications industry. nowwearetalking is managed by Telstra. Find out more about this site.

Customise Page

Customise topic view

Please select items below for your custom page.

Re-organising your page

Log in here

Forgotten your password?Use ssl security

Register now

Use ssl security

Customise topic view

Customising your topic view will tailor your user experience by only displaying content which is relevant to the topic/s you have selected.

This setting will apply site-wide and will remain applied until you wish to change it.

Customise your modules

Customise your modules allows you to add or remove panels of content which appear on the homepage.

These can be added to or removed from the homepage at any time.

Re-organising your page

Is nowwearetalking hitting the mark?



Topic: Telstra , Consumer & Technology

Tags:    blog  bloggers  corporate-communications  innovation  mike-hickinbotham  phil-burgess  public-policy-and-communications  social-media  web-2-0


I was intrigued to see the launch of Crikey’s blog network (blogs.crikey.com.au) this week, which along with Duncan Riley’s Tyranny of Numbers (www.duncanriley.com) post highlights how the Australian social media landscape is evolving.

Connect with me via Twitter (twitter.com/M_Hickinbotham).

I've been watching the changes with interest and thought this was as good a time as any to reflect on Telstra's status as Australia’s largest organisation that blogs and more importantly ask what you think of our approach.

The origins of nowwearetalking.com.au

Three years ago, Telstra had a difficult time getting its point of view across in the media. To help address this problem, nowwearetalking.com.au, was established as an alternative communication channel to promote Telstra’s point of view. For example, unpublished letters to the editor were given a second life through exposure on nowwearetalking.com.au.

Telstra also wanted to encourage genuine two way communication between Telstra and its stakeholders. To initiate the conversation, a central focus of nowwearetalking.com.au was a series of Telstra blogs written by Telstra staff on numerous topics – a first by a major Australian corporation.

nowwearetalking.com.au would also source and produce written and video content from all perspectives – including those who did not agree with Telstra. The goal was to stimulate debate on issues related to Telstra’s contribution to the future of telecommunications in Australia, in terms productivity, economic contribution, the environment and so on.

Broadband Australia Campaign

Apart from being an additional communication channel, nowwearetalking.com.au became the ‘virtual headquarters’ in the Broadband Australia Campaign. The aim of the campaign was raising the profile of broadbanding Australia to become a national issue in the months leading up to the last federal election.

Telstra’s former head of Public Policy and Communication, Phil Burgess, spent his days travelling across Australia promoting the social and economical benefits of a national broadband program. Phil gave more than 80 official presentations and countless other informal presentations outlining why telecommunication is too important to be left to politicians or regulators to decide Australia’s future.

When Phil speaks, the media reports, and this in turn generated greater public awareness and interest. In Phil’s presentations he directed the audience to nowwearetalking.com.au to learn more about the issues.

nowwearetalking.com.au used multimedia tools to communicate the campaign’s key messages and allowed users to share and debate viewpoints in a public forum.

As the virtual headquarters of the Broadband Australia Campaign, nowwearetalking.com.au successfully recruited and energised employees, shareholders and people interested in the issue.

This group became known as the Telstra Active Supporters. This engaged group of individuals were encouraged to share the benefits of broadband through letters to newspapers, calls to talk radio, and discussions around the backyard BBQ.

  • Check out Tony Boyd’s commentary in Business Spectator (www.businessspectator.com.au) that highlights the pros and cons of the site.

Does nowwearetalking.com.au add value to the Australian social media scene?

When Telstra couldn’t get support from institutions like mainstream media and the government, it used the Broadband Australia Campaign to recruit like-minded individuals. During the campaign, nowwearetalking.com.au was the communications hub of an integrated communications strategy that allowed site visitors to share their thoughts and ideas.

Another important aim of nowwearetalking.com.au is to give room for Telstra's many audiences – customers, shareholders, employees and others – to make their voice heard

Regardless of the blogosphere’s criticisms of nowwearetalking.com.au being biased and pro-Telstra, it is transparent and posts comments that traditional corporate affair managers would dismiss in a second.

Tell me what you think

The Broadband Australia Campaign showed that nowwearetalking.com.au isn’t just about publishing Telstra's perspective – it’s also about listening.

I’d like to request a favour from you – to share your honest opinion of nowwearetalking.com.au.

I've read most of the commentary out there in the years since nowwearetalking.com.au was launched. Despite some of the criticisms I believe nowwearetalking.com.au is committed to an honest and open conversation, and in that spirit - I invite you to leave a comment below or post your thoughts on your own blog.

I'll be sure to feature comments and posts in an upcoming post here on my blog, as well as pass them around our team.

To get us started - I’ve tagged some of my favourite Aussie bloggers – so Darren Rowse (www.problogger.net), Duncan Riley (www.duncanriley.com), Cameron Reilly (gdayworld.thepodcastnetwork.com), Trevor Cook (trevorcook.typepad.com), Stephen Collins (www.acidlabs.org), Gavin Heaton (www.servantofchaos.com), Lee Hopkins (leehopkins.net) and Laurel Papworth (silkcharm.blogspot.com) – care to share your thoughts?

Comments

Tony Power
264 comments

25 September 2008
1:40pm

Comment Permalink

Personally I think the censorship is a bit too strict. Also It would be good to instead of not showing disallowed posts show that they were posted but that they didn't meet the guideline and so were deleted. As for the blogs and such I feel having the blogger respond to posts from both sides of the argument after a couple of days would be good.

As for the concept I think its great. We only ever hear sensationalist bad news, so far over exaggerated that for the most part it's totally unbelievable. I very rarely watch TV news any more, preferring to view online news media such as Bigpond news or ABC news along with several others, able to copy and past articles that I don't have time to read all the way through, so that i can read it when i have time rather than setting aside an hour or more a night and sitting down and watching TV. It also makes it easy to read multiple sources giving a more even view.


Mike Hickinbotham
12 comments

26 September 2008
11:26am

Comment Permalink

Hi Tony,

Thanks for your feedback.

Referring first to your comment about the news sources you read, Jeffrey Cole, Director of the Centre for the Digital Future at University of Southern California has stated in a presentation he suspects the newspaper will be gone in 20 to 25 years.

Australians for the first time spend more time on the internet than they do watching TV.

It appears your media consumption habits are representational of the larger trend that media is fragmenting. It will be interesting to watch how Australia adapts to the growing changes.

To your comments about NWAT, my next post will highlight the feedback received from the community and will identify next steps.

Take care,

Mike Hickinbotham


Cameron Reilly
2 comments

27 September 2008
2:59pm

Comment Permalink

MIke, thanks for tagging me. :-)

While I've always said Telstra deserves a certain amount of credit for "having a go", I think NWAT has a major perception problem.

They started in earnest when Tom Reynolds was sacked the day after writing slightly negative comments about Telstra's culture. My perception since then has been that NWAT is highly censored and more of a propaganda tool than a true social media site. Since Tom's sacking, I've paid very little attention to NWAT and I suspect that's true for a lot of people who don't have an agenda, either positive or negative, with regards to Telstra.

However, I also give Telstra credit for experimenting with podcasts (disclaimer: I'm contracted by Telstra to produce podcasts for www.telstraenterprise.com) and Twitter where most large Australian companies wouldn't know how to spell either of those words.

How to improve it?

1. Open it up to ALL Telstra employees. And have a policy in place that says "you won't get fired as long as you are speaking the truth and not saying anything defamatory".
2. Take off the registration before you can comment. People should be allowed to comment anonymously. And it's a pain in the ass to have to register before you can comment on a blog.
3. Do a lot more podcasting over and above Telstra execs spruiking their wares. How about some genuine debates with Telstra execs and their critics? The current podcasts on NWAT are a bit of an echo chamber.

So... in summary... I think it's a good start but has a long way to go before it's truly open and transparent and you will be able to truly leverage the collective intelligence of your market for the betterment of Telstra. It needs to evolve before it will be taken seriously.


regards,

Cameron Reilly
CEO, The Podcast Network (www.thepodcastnetwork.com) &
Host of Australia's #1 podcast G'Day World (www.gdayworld.com)
http://gdayworld.thepodcastnetwork.com/about-cameron-reilly/


Mike Hickinbotham
12 comments

28 September 2008
7:50am

Comment Permalink

Thanks Cameron - I appreciate you taking the time to submit your thoughts.

Cheers,

Mike


Tony Power
264 comments

30 September 2008
1:40pm

Comment Permalink

Cameron Some points I agree with and some I don't.
First of all I do work for Telstra and have no fear of posting negative things about Telstra.
Second I think registration should be mandatory but give an option to make each post anonymous (it wouldn't bother me I wont read any of them, if you don't have the guts to stand by what you say you should probably hold your tongue)
3rd pod casts from more people is fine but how do you propose to set up a debate between Sol and Graham Samuels? I'd love to see that :D


Humble Potato
3 comments

1 October 2008
11:09pm

Comment Permalink

I'd like to see Telstra staff being able to comment anonymously. (Maybe an outside org could confirm staff credentials.) There are things I wouldnt say under my real name - I'm not going to risk my job just to have my 2cents! Sorry Tony Power if that makes you respect me less, but I have bills to worry about.

I do really like hearing Telstra's view out in the public though. It's cool that there's somewhere online where we're not being hounded all day long!


Mike Hickinbotham
12 comments

2 October 2008
9:18pm

Comment Permalink

Thanks Humble and Tony. The Sol and Graham debate brings up images of the Frankie Goes to Hollywood video - Two Tribes. Did I just give my age away?


Tony Power
264 comments

7 October 2008
2:51pm

Comment Permalink

Humble what is wrong with having a pseudonym like you obviously have done (unless your parents were very cruel ;]) I don't care if you don't use your real name I just want to be able to associate what your saying with a name. You can use an anonymous email address (hotmail or gmail are free) It's just that it is very hard to follow a conversation when all the names are 'Anonymous'.

nowwearetalking editor

Tony - you have a very good point and this comment should not have been published, sorry, if you want to use a pseudonym, so be it, how can we know but a least give it a bit of effort, so Mr Potato will not be published again. Jeremy


Add a comment

 

You need to log in to post a comment