nowwearetalking is about telecommunications and you. It's where you can become involved, have your say, and Telstra listens - on issues affecting all Australians and the telecommunications industry. nowwearetalking is managed by Telstra. Find out more about this site.

Customise Page

Customise topic view

Please select items below for your custom page.

Re-organising your page

Log in here

Forgotten your password?Use ssl security

Register now

Use ssl security

Customise topic view

Customising your topic view will tailor your user experience by only displaying content which is relevant to the topic/s you have selected.

This setting will apply site-wide and will remain applied until you wish to change it.

Customise your modules

Customise your modules allows you to add or remove panels of content which appear on the homepage.

These can be added to or removed from the homepage at any time.

Re-organising your page

Mobile phones and health



Topic: Broadband , Telstra , Consumer & Technology

Tags:    arpansa  blog  dr-hugh-bradlow  health  mobile-phone  world-health-organization


One of the questions I am often asked, as a scientist in the telecommunications industry, is whether mobile phones and mobile network infrastructure poses a health hazard. The news commentary on RMIT over the past week has made this question topical, so let me address it in this week’s blog.

First of all, let me start off by saying that there has been a huge body of research around possible health effects of radio waves and mobile phones. The scientific way is to look for clues and evidence and then to validate through careful experiments. Despite much searching (and don’t forget radio has been around for a long time – most of us have experienced it in the environment our whole lives and the dominant source still is broadcast radio), no scientific evidence of a problem at levels below the mandated standards has been found. The standards in Australia are set by ARPANSA - Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency - and based on strict World Health Organisation guidelines and, needless to say, Telstra obeys these standards strictly.

It is good to have such standards, but it is even better if people understand the reasoning behind them, so let me try and explain. First of all, the term ‘radiation’ is somewhat unfortunate in relation to radio waves, because people associate ‘radiation’ with nuclear radiation which is so-called ‘ionising radiation’. To understand what this means, let’s suppose I take 2 billiard balls and glue them to opposite ends of a spring, to represent an atom or molecule. If I shoot a billiard ball at high speed at one of the balls, the chances are that it will rip the ball off the spring and send it flying apart from the other one. This is somewhat analogous to an atom which has been ‘ionised’. On the other hand if I take the 2 billiard balls and give one of them a tug, it will set the spring in motion and the balls will oscillate back and forth towards and away from each other. This is like the effect of radio waves on an atom (which is why a microwave oven heats up your food). As long as I don’t tug the ball too hard, the ‘atom’ I have created out of my 2 billiard balls and the spring, will not break apart. In other words it will not be ‘ionised’, so radio waves are ‘non-ionising radiation’ which is very different from the nuclear or ionising type.

So the standards are set on the basis of known scientific evidence about how hard you can ‘tug’ the atoms before they oscillate too violently. And on top of that a big safety margin is then added. Most of the time, whether you are on the phone or simply walking around the city, the level of exposure you are getting to radio waves is well below these safety standards (in fact, usually the levels that you are experiencing from mobile phone towers are thousands of times below the safety standards).

Let’s get back to that scientific research. There have been literally thousands of studies searching for any unforeseen effects of radio waves on human beings. A number of governments have conducted major reviews of this research, and the conclusion to date remains, as stated by the World Health Organisation,

“None of the recent reviews have concluded that exposure to the RF (radio frequency) fields from mobile phones and their base stations cause any adverse health consequences”

Comments

NuBear
18 May 2006
3:12pm

Comment Permalink

I think in this day and age, it doesnt matter what we do and what technology we use we are going to be affected in some way. Every thing we touch, has some form of radiation or "antimatter" in it. There are parts of the world that now experience acid rain, and pollution is so bad that it is causing higher levels of allergies, asthma and cancers. I really dont worry to be honest about my mobile phone and the mobile towers as i figure there is already such a high risk of getting ill with everything else in the world. There is chemical and industrial waste being pumped into our oceans and streams, gasses in the air; we are surrounded by pollutants. Not to sound too melodramatic and doom and gloom, but i think that most people (whether they admit it or not) believe that enviromental issues are affecting our health, as well as technology such as microwaves, mobile phones, even living under powerlines. So really if we cease to use theese products, can we really escape the inevitable?

Aidan
23 May 2006
9:45am

Comment Permalink

Of course, to have full trust we would have to believe that the WHO and the greater scientific community actually know "everything". Unfortunately, no one can claim omniscience. It wasn't so long ago that most people didn't believe in germs and bacteria. Only time will tell.

OldBear
23 May 2006
10:09pm

Comment Permalink

NuBear has it spot on! What, me worry? Stress will take more years off your life than RF ever will. Other things that will kill you faster include processed food, trans fats, smog, and that creepy person who's been following yu for the past three days. Take a tip from The Fonz and relax.

OldBear
23 May 2006
10:10pm

Comment Permalink

Oh, and antimatter. That stuff will mess you up. Definitely avoid "antimatter"!!!

Mr Germ
3 August 2006
2:44pm

Comment Permalink

Dont knock germs

undistinctive
4 August 2006
7:52am

Comment Permalink

i could be wrong but me thinks 19th century ship radio room operators had very high incidence of cancer on the lower half of the their bodies - the radio amps were often mounted under their desks (for easy maintainence me thinks) - I guess these were very high power - the media hype stems from somewhere - it's statistical - the incendence and proximity relationship - the clusters - there are other forms of clusters too - near factories that emmit high quantites of air born waste - i have not seen many other clear-cut mobile tower clusters - rmit seems like a one-off? - many buildings have cells on them - i dont worry - but i do like the handsfree on my mobile and my cordless...

Nigel
4 August 2006
11:51am

Comment Permalink

Proximity to radiation does matter (don't let a telco install a mobile phone tower in your bedroom), but most of us get more radiation from the bricks in our houses than from a mobile phone

Valerie Butler
22 September 2006
9:06pm

Comment Permalink

Dr. Bradlow, you are paid by Telstra! I don't think I need to say anymore. I suggest people get more balanced information from the WHO website and that they follow the links to other sources of information on EMR. Remember the tobacco industry, remember the asbestos industry, remember the chemical industry especially in regards to chemicals such as 245T, Dieldren etc; they were all innocuous and completely safe as well.

Add a comment

 

You need to log in to post a comment