nowwearetalking is about telecommunications and you. It's where you can become involved, have your say, and Telstra listens - on issues affecting all Australians and the telecommunications industry. nowwearetalking is managed by Telstra. Find out more about this site.

Customise Page

Customise topic view

Please select items below for your custom page.

Re-organising your page

Log in here

Forgotten your password?Use ssl security

Register now

Use ssl security

Customise topic view

Customising your topic view will tailor your user experience by only displaying content which is relevant to the topic/s you have selected.

This setting will apply site-wide and will remain applied until you wish to change it.

Customise your modules

Customise your modules allows you to add or remove panels of content which appear on the homepage.

These can be added to or removed from the homepage at any time.

Re-organising your page

OPEL: the dog that caught the bus



Topic: Telstra , Shareholder

Tags:    blog  broadband-connect  dcita  jason-horley  opel  rhonda-griffin


Just how rigorous was the Broadband Connect tender process? The OPEL consortium is getting nearly $1billion for rural broadband, largely based on a wireless network, and doesn’t have any firm technology plans, nor the wireless spectrum needed to run a wireless service.

Like the proverbial dog that finally chased down the bus, Elders executive, Jason Horley, was looking for an answer to the same question everyone was asking: “What happens now?”.

Even though the virtues of WiMAX were declared in a separate “fact sheet” (www.minister.dcita.gov.au) on Ministerial letter head (elevated to the status of a fourth generation service!) it appears Mr Horley thought WiMAX was more of a generic descriptor for a range of technologies they haven’t made a decision about yet.

According to CommsDay 19-6-2007: Horley said however that the JV was not yet wedded to any particular wireless access platform or solution. “There are a number of spectrum solutions available to us and we will assess it on a location by location basis,”…. as WiMax “was just starting to come to life” the operator was not averse to looking at other players in the market that had the necessary components and were ready to deploy.

(Urgent note to Singtel-Optus media office: This man is far too honest and should have no further access to the media.)

From this it is apparent that the much-vaunted wireless network is nothing more than a pot of money in need of spending – by somebody, ANYBODY, with some spectrum, equipment and expertise. The government may just as well have flown a King Air over the countryside and pushed $100 bills out the window.

The whole thing is so vague, let me make a bold prediction. Someone will soon decide this WiMAX mallarkey is interesting, but not where the real dollars are. Suddenly the mists will clear and out of the fog someone will suggest a high-speed packet download system like Telstra operates.

Then, completely out of the blue, it will be obvious that if you are going to the trouble of putting a data service at all these sites, wouldn’t it make sense to use something that will provide mobile voice as well?

I could be dreaming… but we will see.

Related articles:

Comments

Unionised Singaporean Journalist
20 June 2007
10:06am

Comment Permalink

Oh Rhonda, how could you print this: "(Urgent note to Singtel-Optus media office: This man is far too honest and should have no further access to the media.)" Now we know that Telstra aims to deceive!

Jason Torrento
20 June 2007
11:58am

Comment Permalink

Yes, You would most certainly want to allow for Voice technology. WiMAX Wireless VoIP handsets.. Mmmm Telstra losing profits to VoIP. Hooray!

Frinky
20 June 2007
4:24pm

Comment Permalink

totally spot on. to put it in contex, telstra's next g network uses 850mhz spectrum, and atm, can get 2mbs @ 200KM's..... that is saying something about what spectrum can deliver. 2100 3G HSPDA networks cant come close to 10 km range. how do OPEL expect to get 5000mhz to 20km?? do they expect as to also be in permanate el'neno? because as soon as rain hits, 5ghz wimax wont go through a wet paper bag.....no bs...optus should go over to there competition, telcoNZ(partner in SXC) and buy the 850mhz spectrum that they dont use, or now the 2.3 & 2.5ghz spectrum Ausaliance has, that they wont be able to rollout. value for money, telstra's extend plan of fixed line adsl to 96%iirc & AUS aliances wimax plan together would of = better outcome for australians to recive BB Rhonda, did you happen to catch the 730 report with the minister for telcomunications? total FUD, personally i dont think she has a clue about the tech involved, and wounder who her advisers are.

Michael G
22 June 2007
5:58pm

Comment Permalink

Get a good view of WiMAX from www.wimaxday.net. Front page report talks about Govt decision. It says: "the plan is so radically uneconomical that it is almost reprehensible. The gross misuse of taxpayer funds will result in a network that is obsolete before being built, suitable only for distracting kangaroos and dingoes as they hamper across the wild Australian outback. "

Geoff Stark
23 June 2007
8:09am

Comment Permalink

Jason: VOIP over WiMAX a threat to Telstra and its profits? Reality check, WiMAX with its distance, latency,available frequency (building/solid object penetration) future demand of increased population won't be able to support VOIP in a quality that matters. Secondly a visit to telstra.com will allow you to check out the close to 30 different landline plans offered to consumers and business that offer greater quality and reliability than VOIP. Also you might want to check out information about preferential, community, wide area and regional calling options. Then there are the pensioner concessions, prepaid home, incoming only, virtual message bank etc. I would also advise you research* the USO, average access pricing ( the cost of supply and maintaining a line in the country) *Whirlpool doesn't count as research. Sorry I went off topic but it gets my goat that people think that lack of real investment in communications is a good thing as long as Telstra are not profitable

Dan Warne
24 June 2007
12:42am

Comment Permalink

Oh FFS Rhonda, it's so patently obvious that the reason Telstra is so dead-set against WiMAX is that it was banned from the spectrum auctions that would have allowed it to run its own WiMAX network, and now it is hell-bent on convincing the world that it's a worthless technology because the only capable wireless technology is HSDPA. Which wireless technology did Telstra use to build its NextG network? Oh, HSDPA!

Rhonda Griffin
26 June 2007
12:30pm

Comment Permalink

Dan - Telstra doesn't need to pan WiMAX to justify HSPA investment decision. NextG is up and operating well. The fact that a number of people independent of Telstra have indicated the WiMAX variant comtemplated is not fit for purpose - especially on unlicenced spectrum - just ads injury to insult. No taxpayer dollars should have been wasted duplicating existing services while many communities have missed out. My main point was that it will probably turn out that the money will be used to extend Optus' mobile network, with a wireless broadband adjunct. The net outcome will be they were subsidised to extend mobile coverage and ADSL2+ coverage in outer metro - just as a fillip to competition. This was not the stated aim of the program. It was meant to provide broadband to "underserved" areas.

Frinky
26 June 2007
10:32pm

Comment Permalink

Dan Warne, which wireless standard is supported around the world? and which network can already support the min speed/coverage(off by .4%) req for the BC 1 billion hand out? wimax is a would beater in opel plan, if it was the real type that the rest of the world is deploying......and used sane freq's

Jason Torrento
27 June 2007
1:55pm

Comment Permalink

But Underserved is Underserved: Telstra won't open ADSL2+ without competition. Competition didn't have the government funding that the greedy pigs over at Telstra had to roll out ADSL2+ to start with. So, basically, the government acted as industry forced them to. Telstra were being greedy, the government reacted. Underserved areas can include areas underserved as a result of Telstra's greed, that's my perfect understanding of it.

Carl Eduardo
27 June 2007
5:06pm

Comment Permalink

ptc (posting to confirm) I enjoyed this blog.

Results 1 - 10 of 15.

>>>

Add a comment

 

You need to log in to post a comment